An example of alienation was illustrated in
Stud Terkles book Working, a steel mill worker named Mike didn't feel any
connection with the job he did. He felt that he was never given any recognition
for the work and time that he put into being a steel mill worker. The
alienation between Mike and his job caused him to be unhappy; in the interview
he stated "my attitude is that I don't get excited about my job. I do my
work but I don't say whoopee-doo", by his statement, it is easy to tell
that Mike doesn't enjoy his job. When reading more into the interview, Mike
also says "when I was single, I could quit, just split. I wandered all
over the country. You work just enough to get a poke out of your pocket. Now
I'm married and I got two kids..." by him saying this he’s basically
showing the interviewer that , the only reason he stays is because he is
married and has two children. When a worker feels alienated from their job it
makes it harder for them to take pride in the work they that do. However, in
order to survive in the economic world you have to do whatever you can just to
get by.
The concept of alienation doesn't
always apply to everyone. Some workers actually take pride in their work and
they don't feel a separation. According to the essay Blue Collar Brilliance written
by Professor Rose, his mother Rosie enjoyed her job as a waitress. Rosie made
sure that she could connect with not only her job but with the people that she
served daily. In the essay professor Rose pointed out that his mother took her
time to actually listen to the problems that her customers had in their
personal lives, he states "the restaurant became a place where she studied
human behavior, puzzling over the problems of her regular customers and
refining her ability to deal with people in a difficult world. She took pride
in being among the public...” This shows that his mother didn't feel alienated
when it came to her job, she felt connected to the work that she did. Rosie was
able to make the work she did her own, rather than having it control her.
Karl Marx's excerpt on alienation
proved to be valid in Mike's case. He didn't have the want or aspiration to do
his job. The way that he described it to be was unpleasant, almost as if he was
just a robot. Rosie on the other hand, took her work into her own hands and
proved that not every job can make a worker feel alienated. Alienation could
depend on the job that someone does but also it could depend on the kind of
person the worker is. Mike could be a bitter person in general; all that
negative energy would make anyone unhappy. The way that Professor Rose
described his mother to be, was a friendly person, somebody that everyone would
get along with and maybe that's why her customers felt comfortable enough to
tell her all their personal issues. In that sense, Karl Marx's excerpt on
alienation doesn't apply to all workers and their jobs.
Good clear writing and examples. You want to put Marx in your first paragraph. Show that this is his specific concept that you're discussing, not just the more general question of whether people like their jobs. Go back to that text. You don't have to talk about the whole thing or even feel you understand the whole thing, but go in there, think about the specific kinds of separations he's talking about, and draw on these throughout the essay.
ReplyDelete