Nicholas
Rodriguez DRAFT
Someone’s status is basically who
they are. Whether you’re rich or poor or
smart or uneducated your status is what people see you as. Usually the most powerful or most successful
person has the highest status. We see
rich and successful people and that is what we associate their status to
be. However, I do not agree with
this. The reason I don’t agree with this
is because if we see a person with no money and no expensive things, we
automatically put a label on them without even knowing who they are or what
type of person they are.
This relates to the Blue Collar
Brilliance chapter in “They Say I Say.”
People tend to think of blue collar workers as uneducated or illiterate
just because of their job and the amount of money they make. Mike Rose argued that blue collar workers are
intelligent and their work actually requires some type of education. This is one hundred percent true. A lot of blue collar work requires a lot of
reading and even some math. Workers must
make calculations about the size of an object and the angle that is need to fit
that object through a door or up a flight of stairs. Some jobs require a lot of reading. People must read directions or manuals to be
able to complete a job or build something.
In Blue Collar Brilliance, Mike’s mother was a waitress. She had to remember up to twelve peoples
order at a time. She would also have to
determine how long the meal would take to be prepared and even anticipate what
type of mood the people in the kitchen or the customers were in. Blue collar workers are hard workers and it
is unfair that white collar workers have a higher status then them. White collar workers are no better than blue
collar workers even though people see white collar works as better people and
thus put them in a higher status category than blue collar workers.
This also relates to Who Built the
Pyramids chapter in “They Say I Say.” In Who Built the Pyramids, Mike is a blue
collar worker. He works in a steel factory
and lifts thousands of pounds of steel a day.
Mike has a much younger boss who is straight out of college. Mike’s boss has a much higher status than
Mike because of his position at work, the money he makes and his education
which is what people use to judge his status but you don’t know what kind of
person he really is. Mike is a good man
who works long hours at a factory every week to support his family. I do not think it’s fair that he is looked
down on because of this when in reality Mike’s boss is not better than Mike.
The point I am making is that I
don’t believe people’s status should be judged by how rich or powerful they
are. The higher status should be given to
the better person and the one that does something good or meaningful. To me status is not about what type of class
you are in life but by what type of person you are.
Hi Nick - This is a good start. You want to work on being more specific and building more of a comparison between these two texts. If you think both authors find the way status is currently given unfair, and you agree, talk about what the justifications for the way things are and why these authors and you disagree. Use direct quotations to be more specific about the readings. Do either the workers Rose describe or Mike have some sort of status among certain groups? Does Mike think his job should be held up as something valuable? What internal conflicts does he have? Look at the follow up questions from the assignment to help develop your idea in more depth. Write a few sentences to go a lot more in depth about your comparison - don't just have one transition between two separate paragraphs.
ReplyDelete