In “Blue Collar Brilliance” Mike Rose talks about the every
day laborer. In the article I think he makes against the everyday idea that the
people of the blue collar world are not smart, or lack the cognitive ability of
a person with a white collar job. Mike argues that even though people who do
physical labor may not have educational intellect, their every day tasks
require extreme skill, routine, and finesse. As he refers to his mother in the
restaurant when he describes the work she does he points out the way she can
multi task taking orders while keeping track of the time it takes for other
orders to be prepared. He also talks about his uncle and how his knowledge of
the machines he operated allowed him to make improvements and increase their
efficiency. The level of intricacy and skill that it takes for some people who are
laborers is as equal if not greater to any counterpart in the white collar
world.
In the interview with Mike from “Working” by Terkel, he
talks about how his work makes him a thoughtless mule. I think that this
contradicts what Mike Rose’s piece “Blue Collar Brilliance” because Rose talks
about how much skill and thought it takes to handle the tasks of every day
labor and Mike in his interview goes as far as to say that his work causes him
to stop thinking all together. Mike thinks that his work robbed him of his
youth and intellect, but Rose however thinks that work builds intellect and
character.
Good overview, especially in your comparison of the two readings. Look at this sentence: "In the article I think he makes against the everyday idea that the people of the blue collar world are not smart, or lack the cognitive ability of a person with a white collar job." Read it out loud: how would you rework it to make it clearer?
ReplyDelete